Threaded index     Date index     FAQ


Interesting comments from manosphere about Milo

Posted by Lysander on 2017-February-21 02:18:19, Tuesday

From Roosh V Forum:

'Milo's interpretation (as well as some others) is that he only supports such relationships in rare cases, solely because he felt he-himself was old enough to consent. How do you 100% know that your interpretation is correct, and everyone else's is wrong? . . . The issue is that all Milo said were words, and we should all know by now that liberals and cucks aren't mentally capable of having honest discussions about words. I know what Milo said, but I don't care because they're words. And the only politically expedient (and thankfully 100% accurate, to this point) thing to say is, "Milo isn't a Pedophile."' -- MMX2010

'The biggest buzz seems to be around the idea that "he said adults having relationships with 13 year olds is fine" but he never actually said that (only that in some rare cases they were old enough to get it but that this wasn't enough). When he spoke of "boys" he says he was referring to his 17 year old self. "Boy" could be gay slang. Who on this forum really knows? He also said on the recording that the age of consent laws (16-18 in most advanced countries) are "generally right." Again, you can not like Milo at all, but he should be at least treated fairly and we should try to not join the mob rush to judgment.' - Libertas

'Trump, Bannon and Milo have balls that clank. This coordinated attack will backfire if my suspicions are proved correct. Milo just needs to flip this and turn it around on the people who are attacking him.' -- All or Nothing

'On the bright side of things Breitbart is still quiet about this whole thing so far. Maybe they recognize it as a hit job and are waiting for Milo's conference tomorrow to see how things play out. If he rides these initial waves maybe he'll pull through and be stronger than ever? He is getting a shit load of support on FB right now, maybe he'll survive intact, where many have fallen before.' -- uncledick

'Well, all the controversy will only lead to additional pageviews for Breitbart. I think it would be a mistake from a business standpoint to fire him. You can make whatever judgement call you want about his comments. The fact of the matter is that people go to Breitbart for the edginess of the content and to hear things there they can't hear from the Old Media. If they make an effort to sanitize the place too much, they will become the Old Media themselves. Just ponder that for a moment. Any rebel that is the game for too long, and forgets his founding principles, will eventually become the establishment. Lets hope Breitbart doesn't walk that road.' -- John Michael Kane
  • (https site) The Milo Yiannopoulos scandal is a coordinated hit job (CPAC 2017)
    [@nonymouse] [Guardster] [Proxify] [Anonymisierungsdienst]

  • Follow ups:

    Post a response:

    Nickname:

    Password:

    Email (optional):
    Subject:


    Message:


    Link URL (optional):

    Link Title (optional):


    Add your sigpic?

    Here are Seven Rules for posting on this forum.

    1. Do not post erotica or overly-detailed sexual discussions.
    2. Do not request, offer, or post links to illegal material, including pictures.
    3. Don't annoy the cogs.
    4. Do not reveal identifying details about yourself or other posters.
    5. Do not advocate or counsel sex with minors.
    6. Do not post admissions of, or accuse others of, potentially illegal activities.
    7. Do not request meetings with posters who are under age 18.

    Posts made to BoyChat are subject to inclusion in the monthly BoyChat Digest. If you do not want your posts archived in the BC Digest, or want specific posts of yours removed after inclusion, please email The BC Digest.