Threaded index     Date index     FAQ


Free speech - a sign of not having values?

Posted by alant on 2017-February-20 16:06:53, Monday
In reply to well said posted by kit on 2017-February-20 08:07:33, Monday

that having values or moral convictions of any sort is a mark of weakness.

At least part of the Alt-Right values free speech. Regardless of one's opinion of the Right, it's hardly a sign of having no values of any kind to do so. Why should pedophiles embrace the authoritarian version of free speech favored by their opponents? We'd be No-platformed in a heartbeat.

Milo's shrill response to the suggestion that he might hold even mildly-unorthodox views on paedophilia shows that the Alt-Right are really just as dull and bland

When another fag, feminist or politician refuses to support whatever slightly less anti-pedophile view they may have supported at one time, do you conclude every fag, feminist or politician is as cowardly or amoral as that individual?

If moralism is fine coming from Dworkin, why hold Milo to a different standard?

Follow ups:

Post a response:

Nickname:

Password:

Email (optional):
Subject:


Message:


Link URL (optional):

Link Title (optional):


Add your sigpic?

Here are Seven Rules for posting on this forum.

1. Do not post erotica or overly-detailed sexual discussions.
2. Do not request, offer, or post links to illegal material, including pictures.
3. Don't annoy the cogs.
4. Do not reveal identifying details about yourself or other posters.
5. Do not advocate or counsel sex with minors.
6. Do not post admissions of, or accuse others of, potentially illegal activities.
7. Do not request meetings with posters who are under age 18.

Posts made to BoyChat are subject to inclusion in the monthly BoyChat Digest. If you do not want your posts archived in the BC Digest, or want specific posts of yours removed after inclusion, please email The BC Digest.