Threaded index     Date index     FAQ


A worthwhile (long) read

Posted by Observer on 2014-January-7 16:58:17, Tuesday
In reply to Read The Article:Misinformation and Its Correction posted by Randy on 2014-January-7 11:51:08, Tuesday

Reading (thanks to Randy!) this rather lengthy article only reinforces my conviction that any efforts to "rehabilitate," defend, or be an apologist for "pedophilia" are at best a waste of time and effort, and at worst offensive to society's "worldview" and resulting in a "backfire," as noted on the article.

The only socially feasible path to the eventual understanding and acceptance of consensual sexually expressed boy/older male relationships is in emphasizing the pragmatic needs of real boys (as opposed to the enigmatic and omniscient Nature Boy occasionally imagined here) for such associations (to a greater or lesser extent), and the benefits to the boy of mutually loving, respectful, and mentoring interactions.

Observer (Email)

In the case this post is subjected to ad hominem and/or other attacks – as opposed to civil responses – you may read about the usual aggressors here.

Follow ups:

Post a response:

Nickname:

Password:

Email (optional):
Subject:


Message:


Link URL (optional):

Link Title (optional):


Add your sigpic?

Here are Seven Rules for posting on this forum.

1. Do not post erotica or overly-detailed sexual discussions.
2. Do not request, offer, or post links to illegal material, including pictures.
3. Don't annoy the cogs.
4. Do not reveal identifying details about yourself or other posters.
5. Do not advocate or counsel sex with minors.
6. Do not post admissions of, or accuse others of, potentially illegal activities.
7. Do not request meetings with posters who are under age 18.

Posts made to BoyChat are subject to inclusion in the monthly BoyChat Digest. If you do not want your posts archived in the BC Digest, or want specific posts of yours removed after inclusion, please email The BC Digest.