Threaded index     Date index     FAQ

He wasn't charged with this, though!

Posted by Icarus on 2012-October-12 20:50:18, Friday
In reply to One thing though Icky. posted by Newport News on 2012-October-12 19:08:37, Friday
It completely depends on the text of the statute. There are 51 different definitions of child porn in this country, not including the territories. We're talking about one of them, the federal definition.

State laws certainly vary. Your friend I'm sure was charged under a state law. If the definition in that state included language like "for the purpose of sexual arousal," then they have to prove the viewer was sexually stimulated, and his "pedophilia" and prior criminal history would be relevant.

With Azov we're so far talking about federal, though, where it's not relevant.


Icarus
Follow ups:
Post a response:

Nickname:
Password:
Email (optional):
Subject:

Message:


Link URL (optional):
Link Title (optional):

Add your sigpic?

Here are Seven Rules for posting on this forum.

1. Do not post erotica or overly-detailed sexual discussions.
2. Do not request, offer, or post links to illegal material, including pictures.
3. Don't annoy the cogs.
4. Do not reveal identifying details about yourself or other posters.
5. Do not advocate or counsel sex with minors.
6. Do not post admissions of, or accuse others of, potentially illegal activities.
7. Do not request meetings with posters who are under age 18.

Posts made to BoyChat are subject to inclusion in the monthly BoyChat Digest. If you do not want your posts archived in the BC Digest, or want specific posts of yours removed after inclusion, please email The BC Digest.