Threaded index     Date index     FAQ


notes that if you can be pushed by my argument

Posted by tj on 2012-June-17 19:11:30, Sunday
In reply to I would be fully prepared to agree with you... posted by Etenne on 2012-June-17 17:19:18, Sunday

...toward another conclusion you are engaging in pure inductive logic, not deductive logic. As such, increasing the likelihood in my eyes that you are little more than a weak-minded fool and excuse-seeking-sex-criminal.

I have made no claims that weren't testified to in court. I challenge you to name one thing I've said you can prove to be untrue! I'm sure there are things I've claimed from the transcripts contain events and testimony you'd like to discount but that doesn't count!

While we could argue until the cows come home about none of us knowing that such testimony is actually true, once you go down that road you've pretty much invalidated any form of justice other than "caught in the act then lynched" style reminiscent of the American Wild-West. In fact, Sandusky was caught in the act and had Mike McQueary the guts at the moment it took him some time to muster afterwards to call cops that moment we'd not be discussing this today.

The boy would have been interviewed that night, McQueary would have given his testimony that very night, and the entire investigation would have been run by the police first instead of by the PSU administration, the police work coming only after years were allowed to transpire thereby injecting all this curent doubt, hence debate into the fray.

I assure you nothing you claim as "true" here could make me change my mind since my mind being made up is utterly moot. Even a not-guilty verdict wouldn't do it for me simply because the entire machine he created to facilitate all this is all I need to recognize the classic footprints of a grooming-pedophile. well, that, and the fact that the only charges of the 52 levied likely to be dropped are the ass-fucking in the shower-room episode since that boy has elected not to testify for reasons of his own we will likely never know.

What your increasingly blinded-by-your-own-pathetic-bitterness can change my mind about is how many more intellectually-challenged and morally-decrepit men there are here at bC who claim to be bLs without a shred of similarity to the working definition of bL we've seen mature over the years here at bC!

I am ashamed that the label of bL I took here years ago can be so easily co-opted by a bunch of too-horny-to-control-themselves-rapists-and-rape-apologists. Maybe the truest reality, "eTenne", isn't that you got railroaded but that you didn't spend nearly enough time in jail to learn how to admit to your real crime!

lvoe,

tj

Follow ups:

Post a response:

Nickname:

Password:

Email (optional):
Subject:


Message:


Link URL (optional):

Link Title (optional):


Add your sigpic?

Here are Seven Rules for posting on this forum.

1. Do not post erotica or overly-detailed sexual discussions.
2. Do not request, offer, or post links to illegal material, including pictures.
3. Don't annoy the cogs.
4. Do not reveal identifying details about yourself or other posters.
5. Do not advocate or counsel sex with minors.
6. Do not post admissions of, or accuse others of, potentially illegal activities.
7. Do not request meetings with posters who are under age 18.

Posts made to BoyChat are subject to inclusion in the monthly BoyChat Digest. If you do not want your posts archived in the BC Digest, or want specific posts of yours removed after inclusion, please email The BC Digest.