Post a response:
|
...and as I have explained on many occasions here is a longtime throwback to the earliest days in bC when there was simply no better way than uniqueness and consistency of one's voice and posting style to know who was whom here at bC since registered nicks did not yet exist. dEar oBserver, I understand your point of view but it's not like I start every paragraph, sentence, or even word trhat way. If you haven't noticed the limited specific usage I suggest you work on sharpening your own rather limited observation skills. I never weighed in on the Sandusky case until the inevitable and not at all surprising growth of support for Sandusky began showing up on the bC index. As a counter-voice I sought to take on the most specious, lamest, and community diminishing forms of those arguments. And I'll never apologize for that. As a community that was once loaded with really smart people, time and attrition due to the growth of homogenized and shallow content at bC has apparently rendered any attempt at rational discussion at bC to the automatic "tl:dr" or "we must suport anyone who claims to be a bL no matter what" level, the ensuing litany of the pedophile-criminal masquerading as dumbass bL-loyalist collective seeming to thrive at bC full-time these days! lvoe, tj |