"do not advocate or counsel sex with minors" The rule confuses me. I assume it exists to put the site on more solid legal grounds, in some jurisdictions. Other than that, I can't say that I care too much whether or not the rule exists. While people may tend to describe BC as a pro- sexual contact Board because a lot of vocal members have pro contact opinions, I don't think that whoever manages the Board has expressed an opinion one way or the other. One person is free to express an opinion and another is free to call them a lunatic. Often, it's accepted that people kind of skate around the rules. But recently, that rule has been absolutely, blatantly ignored. I just think the rule should be enforced or removed. If someone argues that one should have sex with an infant offspring as a form of bonding, they haven't stepped around the rule, they've smashed it. |